Why I’m supporting ‘The Trouble with the F-Word’ documentary

Some of you might be aware of the current Kickstarter campaign for a documentary called The Trouble with the F-Word. I was interviewed for this production three years ago now, and I’m writing this blog to share my experience and opinions about the project. I’m going to try to be entirely honest and I’m really sorry if that upsets anyone from either side of the argument but I think it’s the best policy.

 

Here is the film’s official trailer:

 

And here is their Kickstarter page, with another video explaining more about the format of the documentary and the problems they have faced.

 

 

In this video the director – Vanessa Pellegrin – talks about some of the problems with getting the film funded, and also states that she has spent most of her personal income on this project. Vanessa first contacted me in 2013 asking me to speak in the documentary. At the time I asked how soon they were expecting it to air, and she didn’t know exactly but gave me an estimate of around 6-8 months. I was under the impression that it might be airing on BBC3 (more about that below). Vanessa has since explained that the BBC had said they might have been interested but then dropped the project. I don’t want to put words in anyone’s mouth but the impression I get is that both the BBC and other channels stopped being interested when they realised that Vanessa’s approach was to try to be as neutral as possible. This does not surprise me at all –there is very little doubt in my mind that Vanessa’s experience has been similar to what happened to Cassie Jaye in terms of how she has been viewed by both sides. I sometimes wondered why so much time went by without the documentary airing, but never really looked into it until the Kiskstarter campaign came along, but now it does make sense. At the time I don’t think those involved in the program had any idea the process would go on this long, or any concept of the wall of resistance they would encounter.

 

To be perfectly honest, I can understand why people on both sides of the debate are worried about this project. We know how feminists react the minute anyone dares to even suggest there might be a counterargument to any of their positions, so I won’t spend too long talking about it. This is how they treated the woman who set up the first ever women’s refuge when she refused to frame domestic violence as a male on female problem:

images.jpg

 

 

In terms of some of the reservations that people in the non-feminist community will undoubtedly be feeling, all I can say is that I feel them too. When I was contacted in 2013 Nick Lancaster was not yet part of the project, so the format was going to be Lucy Holmes’ journey of meeting people from both sides of the debate. I thought (and still think) that the odds of her doing a 180 on feminism are nil. She has too much invested in her activism, and after three years working on this documentary I cannot see any discernable difference in the ideological bent of her Twitter or the No More Page 3 campaign – she has changed her opinion about things like sex work, but I can’t see her leaving her ideological framework behind at any point soon. Secondly, I was also concerned by the fact that it was likely to air on BBC3 – this was before Reggie Yates, but the BBC has been a feminist propaganda machine since long before that, so I didn’t think there was any way people like me would be presented in a favourable light. Also, to those of you not from the UK, BBC3 is not a channel dedicated to intellectual pursuits – it’s pitched at young people and usually provides entertainment – their documentaries are purely designed to shape the opinions of impressionable people.

 

Despite all this, back then I decided that it was my duty to get involved. If only the more controversial members of my community are willing to speak, or only male ones for that matter, what right do I have to complain if they misrepresent us? If non-feminist women like me refuse to speak then we are playing into the hands of those who wish to paint us as down-trodden slaves to the men who supposedly boss us around, liars, or even sock-puppets. Vanessa was kind enough to spend a lot of time on the phone with me – I had a lot of questions about privacy and I was also trying to understand where she was coming from. Of course I can only vouch for my personal impressions, but she truly did strike me as someone who was trying to be as neutral and unbiased as she possibly could, and that did inspire confidence – no wonder the BBC ended up deciding they weren’t interested in the program she would have made. I had a lot of requests about my privacy etc. that she went out of her way to meet, particularly allowing me to see the final clip of my interview (I don’t know much documentary production but I assume this is pretty unusual). I met with Vanessa, Lucy and the executive producer at a bar before they decided to film me and everyone was friendly – I was offered drinks but stuck to the sparkling water as I needed to keep my wits about me! Of course Lucy and I strongly debated some issues, but I did observe that Vanessa was happy to make points for either side as they occurred to her.

 

It seems to me that if this project was intended to be yet another load of one sided rubbish it would have been funded and aired a long time ago. I did get a sense at the time that the approach to the material was a bit ‘light’, which is perhaps reflected in the tone of the Kickstarter video. I can understand why this attitude may have caused them problems – this issue is not ‘light’ or funny for a lot of the people involved, on both sides. But that doesn’t mean that the producers of this documentary don’t have a right to take that tone – one which is perhaps necessary when trying to be neutral in the face of so many fraught battles and debates.

 

The fact that they have since brought a male presenter on board does add weight to the idea that they are trying to be unbiased, and it’s also true that Vanessa has put so much emphasis on this objective that it would be super hard for her not to deliver a finished product that makes a decent attempt at impartiality. For example, she and I have talked on Twitter about how Roosh V is not representative of the MRA community – she’s done enough research to understand that Roosh and the MRAs are not friends, which is a lot more than many people who have ‘investigated’ the non-feminist community have done. I can still understand why non-feminists are a bit suspicious, and can see why the choice of Nick Lancaster might cause concern – he’s not as deeply invested in the non / anti-feminist side of the argument as Lucy is in hers. That said, I have to take my hat off to the man who is willing to even go near this issue – it is certainly putting his career and reputation on the line. Don’t get me wrong, when I hear Lucy’s arguments in the Kickstarter video about the wage gap or making feminism compulsory on the politics A-Level, I feel royally annoyed and want to shout out all the reasons why I find these points disingenuous. But I have to remember that when feminists watch Nick’s sections they are feeling the same way. Many of them will feel emotional and angry – triggered even. But like Cassie Jaye stated in the video I linked above, that’s the result of the attempt to give both sides the opportunity to be heard.

 

One thing that Vanessa said to me was ‘I’m disappointed to have been asked to become an activist when I am just a filmmaker’. This mirrors my own disappointment in the way that many within the media have handled this issue. My personal hope is that the project will reach its Kickstarter goal. Partly because I don’t want to see a person who has worked really hard and tried her best ruined financially, but also because I’d like to see support for material that doesn’t promise to feed only the agenda of one side. Of course, everyone needs to judge for themselves, but I have made a donation to the Kickstarter and hope that more people will do the same.

 

 

Advertisements

About femalefedupwithfeminism

I am a very proud non feminist female. I believe that women and men are equally valid as people and I don't think women need an 'ism' to prove this. I don't believe in the 'patriarchy'. I don't believe that it is harder to be a woman than to be a man. I don't believe that everything that is gender specific is automatically sexist. I do not hate or wish harm to anyone; I simply believe that there is a more mature and constructive way of dealing with many of the problems faced by both men and women in today's confusing and changing world than applying what is essentially a fundamentalist ideology to every aspect of society and culture.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Why I’m supporting ‘The Trouble with the F-Word’ documentary

  1. VR Kaine says:

    Hi there. I find it very interesting (and I guess not surprising) that someone who is trying to take a pragmatic look at the issue isn’t getting much support or assistance from either mainstream media or the Internet at large. I wonder if it’s simply because, like the race issue, the two sides never really want the issue to be resolved?

    My personal leanings on the issue are quite simple: if rape is still happening at an alarming rate in our society, and boys are apt to making rape threats to a girl who has made an online comment that they don’t like, then culturally there is a problem with men where a woman’s value needs to be “raised” on a number of levels. (And by the quotes I mean that women are already at least equal, but the perception by people who rape or make rape threats is of course that they are not.) So on that front, I agree somewhat with the movement’s spirit, however I almost fully disagree with their tactics, and the values/beliefs of the leaders at their core. Disingenuous and hypocritical at best, downright mental and toxic at worst.

    Anyways, I appreciate you volunteering yourself for the documentary interviews and taking the stand that you do online. I’ll take a look at the Kickstarter campaign and see if it’s something I can make a donation to. In the meantime, thank you for your words and bringing the film to my attention.

  2. borabosna says:

    Any and all attempts to “clean up feminism’s image” will ultimately fail. With millions of dollars that HeForShe has spent and the celebrity of Emma Watson behind it, they could not do it. They only increased people’s hatred of feminism. Do you think you can? It’s futile. Cute, but futile. For god’s sake, Christina Hoff Sommers wrote “Who Stole Feminism” in 1993, which is 26 years ago! How has she been received by feminists since then?

    Why is Vanessa Pellegrin so devoid of self reflection, that she does not realize the fact that millions of “moderate feminists” like herself, who cared more about the label and the identity and most of all the GOODIES and the special treatment they receive thanks to feminism, have been giving legitimacy and power to the “radicals”? Feminism has ALWAYS consisted ONLY of the radicals; the rest never mattered. Any time feminism was criticized, like Ernest Belfort Bax did, the radicals simply pointed at women at large, say “feminism = women”, and called you a misogynist. Women have let themselves be used as deflection shields for radicals, because they were receiving all the special treatments like Title IX, Affirmative Action, voting rights without military draft, more pay than men, quotas in jobs and college admissions, no fault divorce, “you can do anything, and better than men” message that did not match reality at all, and so on.

    They have all been conned and used by feminism as the “useful idiots” they are. One idiot (Vanessa) woke up (maybe), so what? What difference does it make? What difference could Warren Farrell, Karen DeCrow, Christina Hoff Sommers, Camille Paglia and many other “dissident feminists” make on feminism? NONE. It’s too late. Like a hundred years too late. Sorry. Women like Vanessa only started waking up once “where have all the good men gone?” articles started popping up, and the feminist label started to cramp their style.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s